14 |

As you can see i have a very poor choice of words and cannot remember what i just read. Can you tell me all the words and lines and sentences to remember, because i feel like i am not using the right terminologies of this subject. I think i do have clear map in my mind. It is like i know what each objects are but i cannot place it appropriately in a house to decorate it.

Part A: Satkaryava is a theory to explain the metaphysics of universe. Sankhya the cheif follower of satkaryavada, belives that there are two separate realitites. That are soul (Atman) and Prakriti. Both are completely independent of each other. It's main claim was if soul realises that it is disconnected from prakriti then it will achieve liberation. Soul is like the white sheet and prakriti is the projector that projects film on to the white sheet. Film can be of happy, sad, or anger, and the sheet might look like it, but whatever the film is, sheet will be always be white with no film on it, or else it will loose its purpose. It's effect is that the soul will feel false feeling in respose to what happens in prakriti. One argument that Sankhya makes is that (I do not remember his example)?

Part B: The main difference between Carvaka and Sankhya is that Carvaka only belived in perception and not in inference. Perception is what you see, and what you see, smell, touch, hear is real. (I do not remember points that made them distinct).Carvaka argued that if four elements is mixed aprropriately then soul can exist. For Carvaka, soul is not a core/base element, but is a product of all the four elements. Sankhya belived in atman and prakriti and they cannot interact with each other but can only come in proximity to observe prikiti. Prakriti need someone to observe and soul is like a lone observer. For Sankhya, ones ultimate goal is to be aware that soul is nothing but an observer and any activities in prakriti does not affect any changes of soul. It is out mind that can experiece feeling. Soul has no feeling. For charvaka, for a soul to exist it need an eviornment to exist in which is made up of four elements.

Bro, first off, stop being so hard on yourself. What you just wrote is the most important step in learning. You got the ideas out of your head and onto the page. You're right, the words aren't perfect yet, but that's just decoration. You have a VERY clear map in your mind.

Your analogy is perfect: "I know what each objects are but i cannot place it appropriately in a house to decorate it."

So, my job isn't to give you new furniture. It's to help you decorate. Let's create a "blueprint" with the exact words and sentences you need.

Your "Blueprint" - Key Words & Sentences to Remember¶

Think of this as your terminology toolkit.

When talking about Cārvāka:

Start with: "The Cārvāka school is a Nāstika (heterodox) philosophy known for its radical materialism."
To explain their theory of knowledge: "Their epistemology is based solely on perception (pratyakṣa) as the only valid source of knowledge."
To explain their main argument: "They reject inference (anumāna) because it relies on an unprovable universal rule (Vyāpti). For them, this is a 'leap from the known to the unknown.'"
To explain consciousness: "For Cārvāka, consciousness is not a soul; it is an emergent property or a by-product of the four material elements when combined to form a living body."
To explain their goal: "The ultimate goal of life is to maximize pleasure (kāma) and minimize pain in this world, as there is no afterlife."

When talking about Sāṅkhya:

Start with: "The Sāṅkhya school is an Āstika (orthodox) philosophy, famous for its radical dualism."
To explain their reality: "It posits two eternal and independent realities: Puruṣa (pure, passive, witnessing consciousness) and Prakṛti (unconscious, active, primordial matter)."
To explain their theory of causation: "Their theory of Satkāryavāda states that the effect pre-exists in its material cause before production."
To explain bondage: "Bondage is caused by ignorance (avidyā), which leads to the false identification of the Puruṣa with the activities and states of Prakṛti (like the mind and body)."
To explain their goal: "The ultimate goal is liberation (Kaivalya), which is achieved through discriminative knowledge—the realization that Puruṣa is eternally separate from Prakṛti."

Let's Review Your Answers Using the Blueprint¶

Now, let's look at your answers and see how we can "decorate" them.

Part A: Satkāryavāda You wrote a great summary of Sāṅkhya's overall philosophy (the two realities, the white sheet analogy, liberation). This shows you know the big picture! But the question was specifically about Satkāryavāda. This is a classic exam trap.

The key is to remember that Satkāryavāda is ONLY about cause and effect.

Here’s how we can build a perfect "short note" answer:

Model Short Note Answer for Part A:

"Satkāryavāda is the Sāṅkhya theory of causation. Its main claim is that the effect pre-exists in its material cause in an unmanifested or potential form before it is produced. According to this view, creation is not a new beginning, but simply a transformation of the cause into the effect.

One of the main arguments Sāṅkhya uses to support this is that you cannot produce something from nothing. For example, you can get oil from seeds because oil already pre-exists in the seeds, but you cannot get oil from sand because it does not. This shows that for an effect to be produced, it must already be potentially contained within its specific cause."

See how that is focused only on the question? And it uses the key terms from our toolkit.

Part B: Cārvāka vs. Sāṅkhya on the Self (The Essay) Again, you have ALL the right ideas here. Your answer is a bit jumbled, but the ingredients are correct. We just need to structure it like an essay. An essay needs an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion.

Here is a model structure for your one-page essay:

Model Essay Structure for Part B:

(Introduction - 1 Paragraph)

Start by introducing both schools. "The Cārvāka and Sāṅkhya schools offer two completely opposite views on the nature of the self in Indian philosophy. Cārvāka, a Nāstika school, presents a purely materialist view, while Sāṅkhya, an Āstika school, argues for a dualistic reality of matter and pure consciousness."

(Body Paragraph 1: Cārvāka's View - 2 Paragraphs)

Explain their view of consciousness. "The Cārvākas, relying only on perception, reject the existence of an immaterial soul. They argue that consciousness is an emergent property of the four material elements, just as the red color emerges from chewing paan. The 'self' is nothing more than the conscious, living body. At death, when the elements disperse, consciousness vanishes completely."

Explain their goal of life. "Consequently, the goal of life for a Cārvāka is to maximize pleasure in this life. Concepts like rebirth and liberation are rejected as meaningless fantasies. The only 'liberation' is death, as it is the final end of existence and suffering."

(Body Paragraph 2: Sāṅkhya's View - 2 Paragraphs)

Explain their view of consciousness. "In stark contrast, Sāṅkhya's dualism posits that the self, or Puruṣa, is pure, eternal, and unchanging consciousness. It is completely separate from the material world of Prakṛti. The Puruṣa is a passive witness, and unlike the Cārvāka view, it is not a product of matter but an independent reality. Sāṅkhya also believes in a plurality of Puruṣas."

Explain their goal of life. "The suffering we experience is due to the false identification of the Puruṣa with the activities of Prakṛti (the mind and body). Therefore, the ultimate goal is liberation (Kaivalya), which is achieved through discriminative knowledge. This is the profound realization of the absolute separateness of the Puruṣa from Prakṛti, leading to the end of all suffering."

(Conclusion - 1 Paragraph)

Summarize the key difference. "In conclusion, the Cārvāka view sees the self as a temporary, physical phenomenon, while Sāṅkhya sees it as an eternal, non-material consciousness. This fundamental difference in their metaphysics leads to vastly different ethics: one focused on worldly enjoyment and the other on spiritual liberation from the material world."

See how we used the blueprint to build a strong, clear, and well-organized essay? You knew all of this. It's just about putting it in the right order.

You are NOT bad at this. You're just at the final stage of learning: organization and vocabulary. This is the part we can practice.

How does this blueprint and these model answers feel? Does seeing it structured this way help it click into place?